I'm unsure about this one. It has a very particular feel and at the same time, it's too horror-like for my taste. But one cannot but talk about the filmmaker, Brillante Mendoza, who's been constantly the target of critics'.
After his 2008 official competition entry Serbis which was trashed by the whole-Cannes, comes an even harsher feature which many could not handle. And while Von Trier's Antichrist is violent enough, it doesn't come anywhere close to what Kinatay is.
The film follows criminology student Peping for a full day a Manila, from his marriage during the day to his "descent to hell". In order to feed his wife Cecile and their child, he has to make some living, and for that he's ready to do whatever it takes, including helping a schoolmate and his gang get rid of a prostitute because she's late in paying her "fees".
Several have left the theater. And the reason, the butchering of a woman live on screen in a never ending scene. And though I found the mood terrific and the score accompanying the film overall intriguing, I thought Mendoza was searching for provocation. Most of the film has been shot in a bus at night (some could argue about the quality of shooting, I found it very well done), and add the chopping scene, he sure was not looking to gain new fans save keep his older ones puzzled over explicit sex, violence and a morbid story.
On a side note, Tarantino said it was his favorite film in Cannes.
Meet Eric. A postman. Or let's say a troubled postman for he's not envied for the life he has. Two stepsons of the wildest caliber. A wife that he still loves after he left her 30 years ago. A job that's becoming tiresome for a man who was full of life. To deal with this, Manchester United. Or to put it directly, Eric Cantona, who's emerging from his exhaustion to help him move on. And when Eric meets Eric...
Simply a gem. Or the gem I have been waiting for. I loved every second of it. At first, I was perplexed as to why football god Eric Cantona is there, it was forced and the story is so much better without him. But then it all unveiled as the film evolved. The film is funny, serious, simple and to put in cinema words, it's simply Ken Loach.
(2007), Loach proves that he's a master in showcasing reality. And even if he takes the comic aspect of it in
, it doesn't mean it's less poignant.
Hmm yeah. The straightforward story of a man coming to avenge the death of her daughter's family in Hong Kong. Casting French mega rock star Johnny Hallyday to play the role is just a sales boost. I felt he has nothing to do with the film nor the whole environment he was implanted in.
I don't have much to add about this one.
Very meh.
With every new Almodovar film, you cannot but raise your level of anticipation. And with Penelope Cruz in it, the expectation even doubles. After all, she was the only interesting thing in Woody Allen's trite
, IMO, and gives a stellar performance. And she's Almodovar's muse, making
such a refreshing change from the director's previous dramatic works. And here she did not disappoint.
So it's the story of Mateo Blanco, now known as Harry Caine after the death of his beloved Lena in a car accident. Since then, Harry has been blind and ceased to be a filmmaker. He's now a writer. And when the son of Lena's former husband emerges to the story, Harry's life is about to change, and his past will take a different shape.
An intricately woven story (or shall I say stories within stories) because Almodovar excels at intertwining stories to make a whole film that works from beginning to end.
Here everything was so perfect. The music accompanied beautifully the flawless performances of the cast (notably Blanca Portillo), the shots were extremely beautiful. There were some tributes to cinema there too, and there is a film that is being made within the film.
The flip-side of the coin is that Almodovar adventures in the same topics over and over, sometimes you know that what he's told this story before, or at least parts of it. The ending was kind of expected but screw that, the film is made of win. I wouldn't say it was his best, but it ranks among his finest.
To sum it up, I don't know if it's Cruz paying a tribute to Almodovar or if it was him who was paying tribute to her.
Antichristby Lars Von Trier
Denmark, 2009, 104 minutes
Grade: 4/5Best Actress Award (Charlotte Gainsbourg)
With this film, you either adhere to the trip Von Trier is taking you to, or you simply don't. You can't stay indifferent to what he's presenting.
Willem Dafoe and Charlotte Gainsbourg are retreating to a forest they call Eden to help themselves overcome the loss of their child and rebuild their fragile marriage. That's the main line. Apart from that, images. The film starts with a prologue, albeit a brilliant one. Slow motion, black and white, opera music with harpsichord. What more could you want in a scene where the protagonists are making love and the child is ready to jump off the windows on a snowy night.
And then the film is constructed in chapters, and ends with an epilogue.
There are LOTS of heavy symbolism on religion and a rich lexicology (or study) on grief.
But be prepared for real violent (and shocking) scenes once the film really kicks in around an hour after it started. I won't tell you what you're up to, if you decide to see the film, but you should know that many people left the theater and couldn't take it. Some even shouted. I thought it was a bit too much of violence, but mind you, this violence is not free.
Von Trier might have been seeking provocation, but he mastered it perfectly, whereas others claim to be provocateurs, and instead offer nothing.
As to other thoughts around the Cannes screening, Von Trier didn't continue the official screening. 4 women fainted during the film. And the press screening went bad. The negative reviews were everywhere the next morning.
However, I am SO glad Gainsbourg took the award. She pulls an amazing performance. She said in an interview that it was too painful for her to shoot the film, and cried a lot and even screamed at various stages of the shooting. She said her mother helped her a lot in the construction of the character.
All I can say the film is VERY rich. The symbolism is VERY strong. The shots are VERY good. The acting is VERY fine. What more could you want?
Inglorious Basterdsby Quentin Tarantino
USA/Germany, 2009, 148 minutes
Grade: 4/5Best Actor Award (Christopher Waltz)
I'll start by saying that I am NOT Tarantino's biggest fan. His filmography is filled with hit or miss. His last film I thought was pure crap.
BUT, I enjoyed this one tremendously. It's a radical departure from his previous works and the story of the American "Basterds" fighting against the Nazis in the 1940's is told in a very straightforward way. Of course his signature is still here and it shows in his intricate dialogues, the music, and the way the story is told. The film is constructed in various chapters, and like Almodovar's
Abrazos Rotos, there is a film within a film here.
Some we're in the early 40's. Nazis are occupying France and they're searching for every possible Jew to exterminate. That's when Shosanna Dreyfus witnesses the execution of her family under the commands of Colonel Hans Landa. After her escape to Paris, she manages to become the owner of an art house cinema.
And this cinema will be at the heart of this tale in which a group of Jewish American soldiers, known as "The Bastertds," who's mission is to hunt for Nazi leaders.
In a who's hunting whom way, the final scene is set in Shosanna's theater where she will take revenge of the killers of her family.
The acting, well, I will be very honest and say I was absolutely turned off by Brad Pitt's performance as the leader of the Basterds. He was too posy and did not give his best for such a demanding role. You cannot be funny but not that shallow. It left me cold unlike French actress Melanie Laurent who was a veritable tour-de-force and gave a sumptuous performance, and Austrian actor Christopher Waltz as Colonnel Landa, the real revelation in the film, saluted by the jury with an award.
I believe Tarantino was up to the challenge in changing directions with this film. Is it good or bad? I prefer to say it's a refreshing change.
Vincereby Marco Bellochio
Italy, 2009, 128 minutes
Grade: 2.5/5
I don't know what it is with Italian films in Cannes. In 2006, filmmaker Nanni Moretti presented
Il Caimano (The Caiman) about Berlusconi. In 2008, Paolo Sorentino presented
Il Divo about ex-prime minister Giulio Andreotti. And in 2009, Bellochio is presenting a film about Mussolini's illegitimate wife, entitled
Vincere.
So the story is about her, Ida Dalser, and her son, Benito Albino, who has not been recognized by the Duce. It's the fight of this woman to prove to the Italian society that she indeed was married to Mussolini and had a son from him.
The story is indeed powerful. But the treatment, too theatrical, opera-like, bombastic music, early footage of the era and a mega production, left me cold.
Giovanna Mezzogiorno as Dalser pulls a powerful performance though.
So now what's next for the Italians, Berlusconi's scandal with that 18-year-old hottie?
In the Beginning (Original Title: A l'origine)by Xavier Giannoli
France, 2008, 150 minutes
Grade: 5/5
"You've built a section of the highway?
Yes.Where's the road? Where does it go?I don't know..."There are things you don't need to explain.
A L'origine is one of them.
My Cannes' only "five".
The White Ribbon (Original Title: Das Weisse Band)by Michael Haneke
Austria/Germany/France/Italy, 2009, 144 minutes
Grade: 2.5/5Palme d'Or

Some weird incidents are taking place just before WWI, in a small protestant village Northern Germany.
I had higher expectations for Haneke, frankly.
This two-hour and a half long Black and White feature drama with too many kids, families and stories is surely well composed. But I got confused and lost interested.
And with the ending that no one kind of expected, I was even more perplexed as to his intentions before making his film. I had no idea what he wanted me to see with this.
I knew this would win something but not the Palme. But one could kind of have seen it coming with Huppert being the president of the Jury, but I did not want to think of it that bluntly, since she won the best actress award back in 2001 in Cannes for Haneke's
The Piano Teacher. Talk about coincidences or simply the president's decision against her jury?
Wild Grass (Original Title: Les Herbes Folles)by Alain Resnais
France, 2008, 104 minutes
Grade: 4/5
62nd Cannes Festival Prize: Lifetime Achievement Award
Let's face it. This is not
Hiroshima Mon Amour nor
Last Year at Mariembad. But this was not near as bad as what the harsh critics made it look.
Resnais pulls a gentle comedy in which a man finds a wallet next to his car in the parking that leads him to find the owner, a woman who has a pilot license.
The first part of the film has an "old" feel, especially with the voice over. It's clear that Alain Resnais is the director and not some French new filmmaker.
This film ought to be taken as it is. And if you do, you'd understand its true beauty.
As to the award Resnais won, it felt like Michelangelo Antonioni's 1982 lifetime achievement when he won the same prize for his film
Identification of a Woman which I thought was among his least interesting films. So it was kind of expected to use a grand filmmaker's newest work in order to hand him the lifetime achievement award.
The Time that Remainsby Elia Suleiman
Palestine/France/Belgium/Italy/United Kingdom, 2009, 109 minutes
Grade: 4.5/5
I love it when a filmmaker is intelligent and puts his intelligence forward to produce intelligent films.
After his acclaimed Divine Intervention (Cannes Jury Prize, 2002), here comes the new self-centered entry of Palestinian filmmaker Elia Suleiman, a gripping four-chapter tale that starts in 1948 with the declaration of the State of Israel and runs until today.
The film, written and directed by Suleiman, is inspired by his father's notes, the letters of his mother, and his personal memories, all of which make this story a tour-de-force against the occupation.
It is extremely funny, well directed and every shot makes sense, even if the several locations can be seen in his previous films, which I believe was the point to bring them back into this one.
Clearly the filmmaker has never been Israel's BFF and will never be. And this film will spark more controversy because of its honesty. So in short, if you feel nothing towards this, you simply have no soul.
And clearly, Suleiman deserved a prize, although, as expected, left without any. Although that doesn't need any explanation, does it?
Face (Original Title: Visage)by Tsai Ming-Liang
Taiwan/France/Belgium/Netherlands, 2009, 138 minutes
Grade: 4/5
By far the most artistic film of the competition. Or let's say the one with the biggest artsy/experimental feel.
If the Orsay Museum produced
The Flight of the Red Balloon, the Louvre Museum is producing
Face. After Taiwanese director Hou Hsiao Hsien ventured in the French territory for the production of his 2007 feature
The Flight of the Red Balloon (Le Voyage du Ballon Rouge) casting Juliette Binoche and shooting in French, here comes Malaysian filmmaker Tsai Ming-Liang (
Vive l'amour - 1994,
The Wayward Cloud - 2004) to recreate the experience with the French.
The story is about a Taiwanese director who wants to recreate the myth of Salome in a film he's shooting at the Louvre. And while he does not speak French nor English, his cast is composed, among others, of a French actor to play the role of the King Herod while Salome is played by international top Model Laeticia Casta. Because of the sudden death of his mother, his producer, Fanny Ardant, follows the director to his home country for the funeral. But when both return, the shooting would have taken another feel.
The film in itself is a nod to Truffaut. Tsai Ming-Liang chose to pay tribute to the legendary filmmaker by casting Jean-Pierre Leaud to play the role of king Herode and calling him Antoine (Leaud played the role of Antoine Doinel in
The 400 Blows) as well as Fanny Ardant, Jeanne Moreau and Nathalie Baye, all of whom have played in Truffaut's films.
There are some scenes that are surreal in their beauty. The long and complex dress that Casta wears at the end is adventurous in itself, and the sounds produced by its jewelry are a soundtrack themselves.
Some might think it's too slow. Some others might consider it too long with the storyline being vague and the action very rare (SO many people have left the screening).
But for the real fans of Tsai Ming-Liang, you won't be disappointed. He might be shooting in France with French-speaking actors, but he hasn't lost his touch.
Enter the Void (Original Title: Soudain le Vide)
by Gaspard Noe
France/Germany/Italy, 2009, 162 minutes
Grade: 3/5
I am not expecting everyone to have seen
Irreversible, Noe's scandal 2002 film. But I assume everyone knows about it. So when the French filmmaker comes with a new film in competition in Cannes, the buzz is already there. Will this be as irreversible as
Irreversible?
Needless to say, the film was presented at the very end of the festival simply because there are no credits neither in the beginning nor in the end. And part of me thought this was a working copy and not a final one. And with that said, the film runs for 152 minutes unlike what's written in the festival's program (140 minutes).
Onto the film. Oscar and his sister Linda live in Tokyo. He's a drug dealer while she's a stripper. As children, and after their parents' death in a car accident, they promised each other to stay together until they die. When the police shoots Oscar, his spirit refuses to abandon his sister.
The whole film is shot in POV style, the camera always looking at the world from above, as if the spirit is watching. This spirit has access to the whole action in the city, moving deliberately from a building to another. A panoply of colors are offered to the eye. And with every powerful color, you get to access a psychedelic universe that Oscar used to have access to through drugs.
The first hour of the film is extremely well done. The presentation sets the dark and trippy mood of a city that could be Tokyo or anywhere else really, the world of Oscar, his hallucinogenic trips, the universe of drugs and sex...
But it quickly goes downhill after that fine hour. He recreates how Oscar has been shot (even though we know what happened) and then takes us to interminable childhood flashbacks that are unneeded, and the hallucinogenic trips that return every 10 minutes are understandable at the beginning but then they become annoying. The whole sex battalion at the end was what killed the film for me. I mean of course, there HAS to be a lot of sex in a Noe film, but that was too much.
All in all, the film kicked in perfectly. Had it been edited differently and more concisely, this could have been a masterpiece. It kills to give this only three stars because it is worth much more.
Map of the Sounds of Tokyoby Isabel Coixet
Spain, 2009, 109 minutes
Grade: 3.5/5
The final film of the official competition stars Rinko Kikuchi (who played superbly in the Japanese part of Inaritu's
Babel) as Ryu, a Japanese solitary girl who lives in Tokyo and leads a double life: in the night, she works at the Fishmarket while during the day she's a hit-woman.
She is contacted by Ishida, whose boss Mr. Nagara has lost his daughter, Midori, after she committed suicide. Nagara blames David, the Spanish husband of Midori who runs a wine business. Ishida, who has always been secretly in love with Midori, hires Ryu to get rid of David.
The whole thing is captured by a sound engineer, fascinated by Ryu and the sounds of Tokyo.
Kikuchi is superb as a mostly silent girl who does not want to listen to others nor share things about her personal life:
Ryu: "Why do we have to talk?"David: "What do you mean why? Listen..."Ryu: "I'm not going to listen to you. I don't want to listen to you. I don't need a speech now. I'm tired. I'm hungry. And I'm cold."Coixet knows what she wants from the actors and delivers a well handled film from beginning to end. Although what happens is a bit predictable, I did not mind. After her acclaimed
Secret Life of Words (2005) and
Elegy (2008), Coixet, presenting in Cannes her first film in competition, has firmly placed herself on the cinematographic map.
Ending the film with Anthony and the Johnsons'
One Dove elevates the film to pure magic.